Cases 31 - 40 of 174
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bees360, Inc. v. Cai
as 4:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Bees360, Inc.
Defendant:
Zhuhua Cai and Shenzen Jufung Intelligent Technology Co., LTD.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Kun Liu and XIAOQING Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 - Immigration and Nationality
Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards v. Footy Rooty Development, Inc. d/b/a Footy Rooty Institute Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards
Defendant:
Footy Rooty Development, Inc. d/b/a Footy Rooty Institute Houston, Xu "Bill" Liu, Shanshan Ariel Cao and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Liu et al v. Progressive Property Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv00001
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
De Ming Liu and Yong Liu
Defendant:
Progressive Property Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wang et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv04208
Plaintiff:
Jianguang Wang and Lily Liu
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Nguyen v. Liu
as 4:2021cv03670
Plaintiff:
James Nhat Nguyen
Defendant:
Chengchih Liu and Cheng-Chih Liu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
