Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Espinoza for MG v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv02982
Plaintiff:
Mary Espinoza for MG
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Espinoza for MG v. Astrue
as 4:2012mc00599
Plaintiff:
Mary Espinoza for MG
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Harper v. MG Mega Motors, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01030
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Harper
Defendant:
MG Mega Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Downrange Operations and Training, LLC v. MGS Sales, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Downrange Operations and Training, LLC
Defendant:
MGS Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: BP, P.L.C. Securities, et al
as 12-20018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
BP, P.L.C., ANTHONY HAYWARD, ANDY INGLIS and others
In Re: BP Shareholder, et al
as 12-20019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HAYWARD, IAIN CONN, ROBERT DUDLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Allen et al
as 3:2011cv00882
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
David Ronald Allen , William F Burbank, IV , Alex Dowlatshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re BP Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 4:2010cv03447
Plaintiff:
John P Miles , Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System , City of New Orleans Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Anthony B Hayward, Iain C Conn, Robert W Dudley and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Victor Skomedal and Cody A Nedved
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
