Cases 31 - 40 of 286
USA v. Medrano
as 22-50103
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lucas Marie Medrano
Medrano-Hernandez v. Garland
as 22-60071
Petitioner:
Jose Amado Medrano-Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Desmarais v. Bell County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
John Desmarais
Defendant:
Bell County Sheriff's Office, City of Belton Police Department, City of Temple Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Villarreal-Medrano
as 22-40038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joel Villarreal-Medrano, also known as Cornflake
USA v. Villarreal-Medrano
as 22-20029
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joel Villarreal-Medrano, also known as Didier Ricardo Rosales-Rojas, also known as Osiel Villarreal, also known as Oziel Villarreal, also known as Fernando LNU, also known as Cornflake
Mata-Medrano v. Garland
as 22-60004
Petitioner:
Rosemberg Guadalupe Mata-Medrano
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Medrano et al v. KLLM Transport Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Medrano and Sara Medrano
Defendant:
KLLM Transport Services, Inc., Transport Risk Solutions Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Willie Dillon
Not Classified By Court:
Vincent P. Impastato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
