Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Dachel Lopez Acosta v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60871
Respondent:
R WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
DACHEL LOPEZ ACOSTA
Williams v. Tolliver et al
as 5:2019cv01401
Defendant:
Sgt Starr, Vincent Coleman, Col Cottrell and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Prudential Insurance Co of America
as 6:2019cv01151
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Co of America
Plaintiff:
Lariza R Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Everth Rodas-Arias v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60641
Respondent:
R WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
EVERTH ORLANDO RODAS-ARIAS
BMO Harris Bank NA v. William Trucking LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01943
Defendant:
William Trucking LLC, Porter A. Williams, Don R. Williams II and others
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thigpen v. GEO Reentry, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02773
Defendant:
GEO Reentry, Inc., GEO Reentry Services, LLC, The Geo Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Thigpen, Willie Miller, Jesse Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ralph Walsh, Jr. v. Lisa Hodge, et al
as 19-10785
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSICA HARTOS, JOHN SCHETZ, LISA KILLMAN-WORRALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RALPH CLAY WALSH, JR.
Smith et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00065
Interested Party:
Kenneth R. Williams and Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tammeryn Mary Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Sanofi US Services Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv13428
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deborah R. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
