Cases 31 - 40 of 1,203
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Receiver:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Smith
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowell v. National Security Agency and Archives et al
as 6:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Dowell
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Archives, Austin Loyd, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prasifka v. Joslyn, Jr.
as 4:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Scott Prasifka
Defendant:
Raymond E. Joslyn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. James Allred Unit Officials et al
as 4:2023cv03510
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
James Allred Unit Officials, Preston Smith Unit Officials, Bill Clements Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
James Ray Hale
Defendant:
Helen Maree Davis and Lee Raymond Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Salazar v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00217
Petitioner:
Raymond T. Salazar
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Larry et al v. Petronis Cubeta et al
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Kayvon Larry and Raymond Marlow
Defendant:
Kelli Ann Petronis Cubeta, Elizabeth Assunto Germany, Aaron Kinsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Hopson
as 3:2023xc01924
Petitioner:
Attorney Raymond Hopson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
