Cases 31 - 40 of 7,305
Brantley v. Thaler
as 5:2015cv00194
Petitioner:
Christopher C Brantley
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Russell v. Oliver Bell, et al
as 15-41211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
OLIVER BELL, RICK THALER, KEVIN WHEAT and others
Heslep v. Thaler et al
as 4:2015cv02595
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, William Stephens, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojukwu v. Thaler
as 3:2015cv02815
Petitioner:
Theophilus Ekoh Ojukwu
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutherland v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv02186
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Sutherland
Defendant:
William Stephens, Smith, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Divin et al
as 6:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Defendant:
Chris Divin, Virginia Shafer, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thaler
as 6:2015cv00197
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
King v. TDCJ et al
as 3:2015cv01365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Glenn King
Defendant:
TDCJ, University of Texas Medical Branch, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Flentroy v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 15-40516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE FLENTROY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Director of TDCJ-CID, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Deputy Director, RICHARD ALFRED, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Region One Director and others
Miller v. University of Texas Medical BRanch et al
as 6:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical BRanch, Rick Thaler, Yesenia Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
