Cases 31 - 40 of 101
The Shipman Agency, Inc. v. TheBlaze, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00772
Plaintiff:
The Shipman Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
TheBlaze, Inc. and Tyler Cardon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Kennebrew v. Amarillo Parole Office et al
as 2:2018cv00039
Defendant:
Charles Shipman, Amarillo Parole Office and Anthony Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Keith Druzzel Kennebrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shipman v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Theresa Shipman
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Hospira, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Martinez v. Greg Abbott, et al
as 17-51040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD LEE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG ABBOTT, Governor, State of Texas, PAROLE COMMISSIONER RISSIE OWENS, Presiding Officer, State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, DAVID GUTIERREZ, Board-Parole Panel Member and others
The Shipman Agency, Inc. v. IMDB.com, Inc.
as 4:2017cv03087
Plaintiff:
The Shipman Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
IMDB.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Shipman v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv06901
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Shipman
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipman v. Exeter Finance Corporation
as 6:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Gwynn Shipman
Defendant:
Exeter Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Shipman v. Baylor Health Care System
as 3:2017cv00637
Plaintiff:
Elicia Shipman
Defendant:
Baylor Health Care System
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Frosch v. Moberly et al
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Marsha Moberly, Charles Shipman and James Lafavors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frosch v. Moberly et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Marsha Moberly, Charles Shipman and James Lafavors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
