Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Petitioner:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gross v. Walls et al
as 3:2021cv00345
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Hinds County Detention Center and Doctor Unknown Walls
Plaintiff:
John Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Meg Bartlett, State of Mississippi, U. S. Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Burl Cain, Unknown Woodall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Reeves
as 3:2020cv00813
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Harrell
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrin v. Reeves
as 3:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Honorable Tate Reeves
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Herrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch of Government et al
as 1:2020cv00267
Defendant:
The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch of Government, Tate Reeves, Jim Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mann
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
