Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Tibbs v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 1:2010cv00736
Petitioner:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Tibbs v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40907
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ISHMAEL TIBBS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Tibbs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2010cv00465
Petitioner:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarre et al v. Waverlee Homes, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02284
Plaintiff:
Vernon Navarre , James Williams , Russell Roberts and others
Defendant:
Waverlee Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tibbs v. Thaler et al
as 3:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Lumkin, Williams and others
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mortland v. Prado et al
as 1:2010mc00142
Defendant:
William Henry, Lance Kutnick, JoAnne Prado and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Mortland
Tibbs v. Thaler
as 4:2009cv04121
Petitioner:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Tibbe et al
as 1:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Royal R. Davis
Defendant:
Sherri Tibbe, Cecelia Adair and Andrew H. Hug
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Tibbe et al
as 1:2009cv00788
Petitioner:
Marcel Edgar Reyes
Respondent:
Sherri K. Tibbe and Hays County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Tibbe et al
as 1:2009cv00731
Plaintiff:
Marcel Edgar Reyes
Defendant:
Sherri K. Tibbe and The Honorable Judge Presiding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
