Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Peterson et al v. Applebees Restaurants L L C
as 5:2018cv01215
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2, Apple Arkansas Inc and Applebees Restaurant L L C
Plaintiff:
Mell Peterson and Clarence Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forte v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00907
Defendant:
G & K Services L L C, Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C, Walmart Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Shelia Forte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullard v. Marker et al
as 1:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bullard
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2, Inc. and Dayna Marker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Young v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 3:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Robert Young, Jr
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 5:2017cv00896
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chauvin v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Amy Ilena Chauvin
Defendant:
Cintas Corp. No. 81, Cintas Corporation No. 2, Cintas Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grady Rentals LLC v. Cintas Corporation
as 3:2016cv03353
Plaintiff:
Grady Rentals LLC
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Robinson v. Administrative Segregation et al
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson
Defendant:
Administative Segregation, The Inmate Grievance Office, Aramark Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steinocher v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 2:2015cv00431
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Plaintiff:
Larry J Steinocher
Counter_claimant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Counter_defendant:
Larry J Steinocher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
