Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Duarte v. Davis
as 4:2019cv04228
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Omar Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duarte v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv01355
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Catherine Dicarlo Duarte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sanchez et al v. Penske Logistics, L.L.C et al
as 1:2019cv01145
Defendant:
Penske Logistics, L.L.C, Wheaton Van lines, Inc., Spike, Inc. d/b/a Olympia Moving & Storage Company and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Sanchez, David Duarte and Jose Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Duarte v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2019cv03218
Petitioner:
Omar Duarte
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duarte, et al v. Diamond Energy Services, LP
as 4:2019cv00605
Plaintiff:
Erika Duarte, Luis Rios Guima, Maria Meza and others
Defendant:
Diamond Energy Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duarte v. Diaz-Jaimes et al
as 1:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Antoninio Diaz-Jaimes, Cristal Diaz-Duarte, Cristian Diaz-Duarte and others
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Lopez Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Duarte-Pizarro v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv00129
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Oscar Duarte-Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOE v. Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District et al
as 4:2018cv03556
Plaintiff:
JANE GCCISD-LM DOE
Defendant:
Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District, MELISSA DUARTE, THERESA KEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barahona v. ICE
as 3:2018cv02393
Petitioner:
Jorge Nestor Duarte Barahona
Respondent:
ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duarte-Gonzalez v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in [4:13-cr-446-2].
as 4:2018cv04002
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Joel Duarte-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
