Cases 41 - 50 of 1,376
Andino-Ramoset al v Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv04646
Plaintiff:
DALIA MELISSA ANDINO RAMOS, DONIS MANUEL MATAMOROS GARCIA, Dalia Melissa Andino-Ramos and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Wallace Carroll
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia et al v. Ramos et al
as 5:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Edgar Garcia, Eric Garcia and April Garcia
Defendant:
Oscar Ramos, Bryan Patten, Juan Carlos-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos et al v. Freedom Transport Corp et al
as 6:2023cv01734
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co, Freedom Transport Corp, Jass Transport Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Ramos, Juana Mendez Ramos and Juana Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ramos v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 4:2023cv04580
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Ramos
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50873
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
USA v. Ramos-Palomino
as 23-50831
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gaspar Ramos-Palomino, also known as Gaspar Ramos
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50835
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gaspar Ramos
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz v. Enlish Cantu et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant:
Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Roxanna Rios, Olga Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia Ramos v. Garland
as 23-60571
Petitioner:
Merli Garcia Ramos
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
