Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Williams v. USA
as 6:2014cv02188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ty Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Campbell v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Kevin Campbell
Defendant:
James W Williams , Faye Williams , Mark T. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy Williams v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 14-30028
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Williams v. Thornton et al
as 5:2013cv01093
Defendant:
Harry Clark and Michael Thornton
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Roman et al
as 5:2013cv00980
Defendant:
Parole Office, Susan D. Reed, Judge Mary Roman and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 3:2013cv02620
Plaintiff:
Roy Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allred et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
John Allred , Jessie Almo , Tommy Anderson and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R&G Produce Company v. Williams Farms Produce Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
R&G Produce Company
Defendant:
Williams Farms Produce Sales, Inc., James W. Williams, Faye Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shope et al v. Explo Systems Inc
as 5:2012cv02496
Plaintiff:
Kenny Shope , Steven Shoup , Patrick Simpson and others
Defendant:
Explo Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Nash et al
as 2:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Darrell K Nash and Leo J Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
