Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Michael Escamilla v. C.R. Bard Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv01103
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capers v. C.R. Bard Inc., et al
as 4:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Capers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Annabelle Espinoza v. C. R. Bard Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv01104
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Annabelle Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Couturier v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12497
Plaintiff:
Craig Couturier
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levy et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12498
Plaintiff:
William Levy and Patricia Levy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12499
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tharanika Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMurdy et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Coloplast A/S, Mpathy Medical Devices, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nina Lee McMurdy and Frederick McMurdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2019cv00956
Defendant:
Davol Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron P. Walker and Aaron P Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00377
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jacquline Ferguson and Edward Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sifuentes-Bravo v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00023
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesus Sifuentes-Bravo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
