Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Crook v. The City of Greenville, Mississippi et al
as 4:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Anthony Crook
Defendant:
The City of Greenville, Mississippi, Washington County, Mississippi, Sam Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Vera Dukes
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Goldfield Plantation et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
Goldfield Plantation, Goldfield Plantation, Goldfield Plantation and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Cropscience GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dukes v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Vera Dukes
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hedrick, et al v. Metropolitan Life, et al
as 1:2000cv00485
Plaintiff:
Betty Ann Smith, Brenda Diane Jones, Sally F. Tharp and others
Defendant:
U.C. Realty Corporation, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Insulation Contracting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dukes v. Davis et al
as 2:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Travis Dukes
Defendant:
Hubert Davis, Ron King, Jonathon Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 1:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Bobby Edward Walker
Defendant:
Jim H. Johnson, Tony Carleton, Dorothy McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wren v. Duke
as 3:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mattie Wren
Defendant:
Richard E. Duke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dukes v. Hood
as 2:2008cv00215
Petitioner:
Travis Dukes
Respondent:
Jimmy Hood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dukes v. Hood
as 2:2008cv00195
Plaintiff:
Travis Dukes
Defendant:
Jimmy Hood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
