Cases 41 - 50 of 925
Evans v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Michelle Evans
Defendant:
Jose Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Does 1-877
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Evans
Defendant:
Does 1-877
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Counsel Holdings, Inc. v. Jowers, et al.
as 1:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Counsel Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
John or Jane DOE, Evan P. Jowers, Legis Ventures (HK) Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Nancy Perryman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishinghawk v. Mooneyham
as 3:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Evan C Fishinghawk
Respondent:
FNU Mooneyham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Evans v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Evans
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Capt. Christopher Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
as 4:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Teresa Evans
Defendant:
Kroger Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Evans v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Archer Lee Evans
Defendant:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
