Cases 41 - 50 of 791
Patent Armory Inc. v. Artec Europe, S.a.r.l.
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. and Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Artec Europe, S.a.r.l.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Gonzales et al v. Hile et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gonzales and Michele Renee Gonzales
Defendant:
Larissa M. Hile, Jenna Seeney, William Longlois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hogan v. Aspire Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hogan
Defendant:
Aspire Financial, Inc. doing business as Aspire Lending, Donald E. Uloth, Felicia Pitre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Albright v. Lane et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Albright
Defendant:
Kevin Lane, Kathrine Branch and Buddy Hahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. City of Houston
as 4:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lane
Defendant:
CITY OF HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
King, Jr. v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Kourtney S. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. HouLight
as 4:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
HouLight
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
