Cases 41 - 50 of 214
Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Burns
as 4:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Defendant:
Michael Heath Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McGee v. Brian Collier et al
as 6:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant:
TDCJ Director, Warden Bruce Armstrong, Katherine Knicely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Office of the Attorney General
as 4:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Goodloe, Jr
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodloe v. Office of the Attorney General
as 3:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Goodloe, Jr
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Aliu et al
as 6:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Suleiman Aliu, Lucky Enebulele and Nicolas Nosegbe
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Duarte Torres
as 1:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jose Camacho
Defendant:
Heber Duarte Torres, Jesus Evaristo Guerra, E. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant:
Warden FNU Armstrong, Major FNU Voyles, Officer FNU Montenegro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. McKenzie
as 4:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brooks McKenzie
Defendant:
Kelli Marie McKenzie, Dawn King, Kelly Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shafer v. Collier et al
as 6:2019cv00114
Defendant:
FNU Witten, Kevin W Thomas, FNU Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
