Cases 41 - 50 of 99
USA v. Robert Antrim
as 16-60283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT ANTRIM
Freddie Fountain v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 16-90008
Plaintiff - Respondent:
FREDDIE FOUNTAIN
Defendant - Petitioner:
WARDEN JOHN A. RUPERT, SARAH PIERSON, Nurse Practioner, University of Texas Medical Branch, MARY TALIAFERRO, Licensed Vocational Nurse, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Scott et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freddie Fountain v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 15-41261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE FOUNTAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, JOHN DOE, Inspector General Texas Department of Criminal Justice, WARDEN JOHN A. RUPERT and others
Moore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2015cv02071
Plaintiff:
Virgil L Moore
Defendant:
Wilford A Anderson, Robert Scott, Jim Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Erik M Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Rupert, Larry Doyle, Patrick Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIS COMPANY, INC. v. Stover
as 4:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
HIS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
Robert Scott Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Thaler
as 6:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John A Rupert, Larry G Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEC v. Life Partners Holdings, Inc., et al
as 14-51353
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
LIFE PARTNERS HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, BRIAN D. PARDO and ROBERT SCOTT PEDEN
Bolden v. Scott et al
as 4:2014cv01549
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bolden
Defendant:
Robert Scott, Chris Daniel, Adrian Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
