Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Pedro Morales v. John Fox, et al
as 12-40111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Complex Warden, Bureau of Prisons Beaumont, JODY R. UPTON, Warden, Bureau of Prisons Beaumont Medium, T. HAMMONDS, CCA at University of Texas Medical Branch, Beaumont Medium and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00299
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00290
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mendez v. Martin et al
as 1:2011cv00261
Plaintiff:
Francisco Mendez
Defendant:
M. Martin and J Womble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wise v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Wise
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Shockley v. John Fox, et al
as 10-41172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE SHOCKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN FOX, Warden, T C OUTLAW, Past Warden, RICARDO RIOS, Assistant Warden and others
Salcido v. Womble et al
as 1:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Armando Salcido
Defendant:
John Carl Womble, UP, UP Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v.United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Will Stewart
Defendant:
UP Martin, John Womble, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wiltshire v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00992
Plaintiff:
Eric Wiltshire
Defendant:
United States of America, M. Martin, John Womble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
