Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Smith v. Newton et al
as 5:2015cv02601
Plaintiff:
Martha Ruth Smith
Defendant:
Karen Newton, Eddie Newton, Rolonda Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv02218
Plaintiff:
Paul Newton, Jr.
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
ALTUS GTS, Inc. v. ESP Receivables Management, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00806
Plaintiff:
Altus GTS, Inc.
Defendant:
ESP Receivables Management, LLC and William J Newton
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Harang, APLC v. Schwartz
as 2:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jack W. Harang, APLC
Defendant:
Newton B. Schwartz, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNealy v. Becnel et al
as 2:2014cv02181
Defendant:
Darryl J. Becnel, Shell Chemical Co IP, Motiva Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Newton McNealy
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Newton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, LLC of Louisiana
as 2:2014cv01932
Plaintiff:
Andre Newton
Defendant:
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, LLC of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Newton v. J.R.'s Trucking, LLC, et al et al
as 3:2014cv00211
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Company, J.R.'s Trucking, LLC, Clarence E. Melsoon and others
Plaintiff:
Britton Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Russell v. Evans et al
as 5:2013cv03248
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lynn Russell
Defendant:
Evans, Newton, Montenegro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siegel v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv03163
Plaintiff:
Newton Siegel
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
