Cases 51 - 60 of 349
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 23-10246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas and Mayo Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA
as 23-40076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R J Reynolds Tobacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Incorporated, ITG Brands LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Stephen M. Hahn, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60037
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Xavier Becerra, Marvin Figueroa and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Emanuel McCray
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., AIR METHODS CORPORATION, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
