Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Rivas Ortiz v. G E O Group Inc et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rivas Ortiz
Defendant:
G E O Group Inc, Ed Gonzalez, Joseph Taunton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simon v. Terrell et al
as 1:2011cv01310
Plaintiff:
Lonnie B Simon, Jr
Defendant:
T Terrell, Harris, Harman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Shepard et al
as 2:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
Landrus Arnold
Defendant:
Theresa Shepard, Terry Terrell, G E O Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. GEO Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Kelly
Defendant:
G E O Corp, Warden Allen Correctional Center, Joseph Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G E O Shipyard Inc v. Baumann Marine Services Inc et al
as 6:2009cv02172
Defendant:
Baumann Marine Services Inc , Rolls Royce Naval Marine Services Inc and Rolls Royce Naval Marine Inc
Plaintiff:
G E O Shipyard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Rolls Royce Naval Marine Services Inc v. G E O Shipyard Inc
as 6:2009cv01993
Plaintiff:
Rolls Royce Naval Marine Services Inc
Defendant:
G E O Shipyard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Lofton v. G E O Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv01789
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lofton
Defendant:
G E O Corporation, Allen Correctional Center, Terry L Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. G E O Group Inc et al
as 1:2009cv01198
Plaintiff:
Edward Ortiz Flores
Defendant:
G E O Group Inc, Garrison, David Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. E O G Resources Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
David Hudson, Jr
Defendant:
E O G Resources Inc, E O G Resources Inc, Woodbine Production Corp and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. C E O Venture Fund III L P
as 5:2008mc00052
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
C E O Venture Fund III L P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
