Cases 51 - 60 of 408
Person v. Beauregard Parish et al
as 2:2021cv03192
Plaintiff:
James Derek Person, II
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Beauregard Parish, Jail of Beauregard Parish, Freddie Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCour v. Beauregard Parish et al
as 2:2021cv03195
Plaintiff:
Reginald D LaCour
Defendant:
Jail of Beauregard Parish, Sheriffs Dept Beauregard Parish, Freddie Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill et al v. Liberty Personal Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv02631
Plaintiff:
Carole Gill and Jessie Gill
Defendant:
Liberty Personal Insurance Company and Liberty Personal Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv02747
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Gill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emmons v. Gilles
as 21-50603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Audis Emmons
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge George J. Gilles, 142nd District, Midland County, Midland County, Sheriff Gary Painter, Midland County Sheriff's Department and others
Kaur v. Gill et al
as 3:2021cv01455
Defendant:
Avneet Gill
Plaintiff:
Jaswinder Kaur
Not Classified By Court:
Birinder Pannu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. Clements et al
as 5:2021cv01168
Plaintiff:
Dordarrius Gill
Defendant:
Amerifield, Inc., Transportation Authority, LLC, Adrianon Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coomer v. Roth
as 21-10182
Defendant / Appellee:
Mickenzie M. Gill, Julie A. Marguez, Anthony R.. Marguez, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey Harris Coomer
Gill v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00033
Petitioner:
Larry Gill
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
