Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Porter v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv02571
Petitioner:
John Lee Porter
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Basey v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20503
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEE BASEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lee et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv02419
Plaintiff:
John Lee and Patty Lee
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brady v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2014cv02275
Plaintiff:
John Lee Brady
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Aguirre et al v. ISC Constructors, LLC
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Victor Aguirre , All Plaintiffs , Raul Flores-Regino and others
Defendant:
ISC Constructors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Paganini v. MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03328
Plaintiff:
Michael Paganini
Defendant:
MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc., George M Lee, Don J Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kuo v. MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03198
Plaintiff:
Hsin-Hui Kuo and All Plaintiffs
Defendant:
MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc., George M Lee, Don J Wang and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Michael Paganini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cockerham v. Chapa
as 3:2013cv00327
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roane v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv03006
Petitioner:
John Lee Roane
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. John Posey
as 13-50570
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN LEE POSEY, also known as John-John
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
