Cases 51 - 60 of 1,164
Martin v. Busby
as 2:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Daniel Neal Martin
Respondent:
Larry R Busby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 5:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Blondzetta Hay Neal
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soechting v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Michael Neal Soechting
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Martin v. Live Oak
as 23-40254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant / Appellee:
Live Oak County Jail, Live Oak County Sheriffs Department, Cara Kay Joiner Barton and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Neal et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Anderson Lee, Jr
Defendant:
Rockella L. Neal, Jasmine L Graham and Deanda Y Turk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Innovation Law Lab
as 6:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Blesi v. Soil Building Systems Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Blesi
Defendant:
Soil Building Systems Inc, Baron Ablon and Neal Gutkin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Torres v. Foust et al
as 6:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Israel Antonio Torres
Respondent:
Keith Foust, Netty Angella, Lonnie E. Townsend VI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
