Cases 51 - 60 of 539
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02588
Plaintiff:
Rudy G Gonzalez and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Parker v. Collier
as 22-50443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steve V. Parker, also known as Jerry Wilson
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Rudzavice et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Steve V. Parker and Jerry Wilson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Rick Thaler, Lori Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Gregg County Sheriff Dept
as 22-40202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derik W. Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregg County Sheriff Department and Rudy Desontos
Ortiz v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02013
Plaintiff:
Rudy Ramirez Ortiz
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Penske Leasing and Rental Company, Pensky Truck Leasing, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fuentez v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Cesar Fuentez
Defendant:
City of Austin, John Doe, Limary Barajas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-50224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Romero
as 22-50309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Rudy Romero
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
