Cases 61 - 70 of 906
Cantu v. Diesel Auto Expres, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Danny Omar Cantu
Defendant:
Diesel Auto Expres, L.L.C. and Allan Martin Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cantu v. Unknown Defendant
as 4:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Cantu
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza et al v. UV Logistics et al
as 4:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
Blanca Nidia Cantu Garza, Individually and a/n/f of I.G.H., a Minor and Blanca Nidia Cantu Garza
Defendant:
UV Logistics LLC dba United Vision Logistics, Frederick Azema and UV Logistics LLC doing business as United Vision Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
USA v. Cantu
as 23-50310
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Desiree Angelina Cantu
USA v. Cantu
as 23-10403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Joe Cantu
Tinoco v. City of Hidalgo, Texas et al
as 7:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Rafael Tinoco
Defendant:
City of Hidalgo, Texas, Mayor Sergio Coronado, Police Chief Romeo Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantu et al v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Richard Cantu and Telma Cantu
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CANTU v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
ELLOY CANTU
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
401 Sycamore v. Cantu
as 23-40183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
401 Sycamore, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Marco A. Cantu, Roxana Cantu, Thornton Biechlin Reynolds & Guerra and others
Cantu v. Olveda
as 5:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cantu
Defendant:
Homer Olveda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
