Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named U.S. Agents et al
as 3:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown Named U.S. Agents, United States Attorney, One Named AUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez-De Aza v. BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
as 7:2013mc01794
Defendant:
BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
Plaintiff:
Jose Vicente Hernandez-De Aza
Garner v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Eskico Garner
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Benjamin Roark v. Regina Flannery, et al
as 13-40598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. ROARK
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIVIDUALS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORMER AND CURRENT, ERIC HOLDER, ALBERTO GONZALES, Former United States Attorney General and others
Rodriguez v. Dixon et al
as 5:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Diaz Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kerry Dixon, BOP, Medical Department Giles Dalby C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00289
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burman v. Martin et al
as 1:2012cv00211
Petitioner:
Allah A Burman
Respondent:
M. Martin, U S Parole Commission and Regional Director, Texas BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Warden et al
as 1:2011cv00693
Petitioner:
Timothy Smith
Respondent:
Warden, BOP and Atlanta FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watkins v. Numerous Bureau of Prison Officials et al
as 1:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
Numerous Bureau of Prison Officials, FNU Carter, Numerous Unknown Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
