Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Coach, Inc. et al v. AHMSP Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv01864
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
AHMSP Corporation, Fatima Tahir and Tahir Idrees Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
United States of America v. Tahir et al
as 4:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ahmed Tahir and Fatima Tahir
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023
USA v. Fatima Ransom
as 11-10172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FATIMA RANSOM
Coach, Inc. et al v. Coco Boutique et al
as 3:2010cv02418
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mercado Garibaldi, A Toda Moda, Olga Antonia Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Gates v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Fatima Andrea Gates
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abdullah et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Farid Abdullah and Fatima Karim
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Emilio Gonzalez and Evelyn Upchurch
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 4:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
K David Williams, K David Williams, K David Williams and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Technical Center and others
Mediator:
R D "Spike" Pattillo
Cause Of Action: Diversity
In Re: Toyota Motor, et al, et al
as 08-41323
Petitioner:
In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP, TOYOTA TECHNICAL CENTER, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES and others
Respondent:
K DAVID WILLIAMS and FATIMA K WILLIAMS
In Re: Toyota Motor, et al
as 08-41281
Petitioner:
In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP, TOYOTA TECHNICAL CENTER, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
K DAVID WILLIAMS and FATIMA K WILLIAMS
Gomez-Montez v. Mukasey
as 08-60057
Petitioner:
FATIMA GOMEZ-MONTEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
