Cases 61 - 70 of 4,712
Garcia v. U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia-Bahena v. USA
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jorge Garcia-Bahena
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Garcia-Dixon v. Nova Mud, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Veronica Garcia-Dixon
Defendant:
Nova Mud, Inc. and Christian Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Garcia v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Garcia
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Garcia v TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Enrique Garcia
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. STARR COUNTY TEXAS et al
as 7:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Maria N Garcia, Jose Bazan and Jose Bazan Jr
Defendant:
Starr County Texas, Gocha A Ramirez and Gerardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
