Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Banks v. Pearson et al
as 5:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Marvin Blow, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cook v. Lappins
as 7:2010cv00013
Petitioner:
John Lee. Cook
Respondent:
Director Harley Lappins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mizell v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Petitioner:
Robert E. Mizell
Respondent:
Karen Edenfield and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banks v. Blow et al
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Marvin Blow, Bruce Pearson, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Holsten et al
as 5:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
David Holsten, Unknown Toffelmme, Unknown Tigner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bowman v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv02167
Plaintiff:
James Bowman
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Check, et al
as 5:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Samuel Check, Phillip Jackson, Ruby Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Wall v. Black, et al
as 09-60871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
BLACK, JACKSON, Counselor, BRUCE PEARSON and others
Banks v. Chisolm et al
as 5:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Lisa Chisolm, Bruce Pearson, Skipper Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Everette et al
as 5:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
K. Everette, Elizabeth Foster, Lisa Chisolm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
