Cases 61 - 70 of 230
Brown v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04697
Plaintiff:
Joni Brown
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McBride v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2018cv01437
Plaintiff:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Freel v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Joni H Freel
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15106
Plaintiff:
Joni Walker
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roger Thieleman v. Joni White, et al
as 17-41196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER MERRITT THIELEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JONI WHITE, MAJOR CLARK, DOCTOR UNKNOWN DEER and others
Curtis v. Egan et al
as 6:2017cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Curtis
Defendant:
Cheryl K Egan, Joni White, Unknown Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sugar Franklin v. Pamela Thielke, et al
as 17-50861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUGAR RAY FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA THIELKE, ANGELA NATION, JONI WHITE and others
Richard Barroso v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-40922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BARROSO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and others
Franklin v. Thielke et al
as 1:2017cv00729
Defendant:
Jacqueline Dickerson, Jeffrey Dombrosky, Arnetta Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Sugar Ray Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawver v. Collier et al
as 4:2017cv02240
Plaintiff:
Curtis L Shawver
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Joni White and Yance Drum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
