Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Kansas City Southern Railway Co v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
as 5:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
Kansas City Southern Railway Co
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kansas City Soutern Railway Co. v. James Mark Guidry et al
as 3:2010cv00845
Notice Only:
Bristol Baxley
Defendant:
Null Dixon, Dixon & Sons Trucking Co., Inc., James Mark Guidry and others
Plaintiff:
Kemetrick Thomas and Kirkland Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Sampson et al v. GATX Corp et al
as 5:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
Amy Avery Sampson, Kalei Alyssa Sampson and Tucker Lloyd Sampson
Defendant:
GATX Corp. , GATC Corp. , Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C v. Land DeSoto Parish
as 3:2010cv00666
Plaintiff:
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Co and Land DeSoto Parish
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barbara Elam, et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway, et al
as 10-60227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA ELAM and BOBBY ELAM
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. and RONALD L. MICHAEL
Henry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co
as 3:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of claim in civil action related to BK. case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-30624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
