Cases 61 - 70 of 3,568
Miranda Perez v. Garland
as 24-60061
Petitioner:
Adriana Elisa Miranda Perez and Geidy Yadira Gomez Miranda
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Perez
as 24-10099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Perez
Perez Dowling v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Angela Dawn Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Of America and State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-60057
Petitioner:
Pedro Perez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Cruz-Perez
as 24-30065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cesar Yarmy Cruz-Perez
Mila v. Val Verde Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Pedro Mila Perez
Defendant:
Val Verde Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mila v. Val Verde Detention Center
as 6:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Mila and Pedro Mila Perez
Defendant:
Val Verde Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Albert Perez v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Albert Perez
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee of LSF9 Master Participation Trust, Fay Servicing, LLC and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC v. 5.11 Acres of Land, more or less, in Cameron County et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
5.11 Acres of Land, more or less, in Cameron County, Mario Presno Perez and Niobe Elena Rubin De Presno
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
