Cases 71 - 80 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Erosa v. Aramark Corporation. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2012cv02157
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vicente Erosa
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fleming v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
United States of America , Leslie Powers, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robinson v. Baylor NHS et al
as 3:2012cv01629
Plaintiff:
Alicia Sherrie Robinson
Defendant:
Baylor NHS and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zavala v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2012cv00466
Defendant:
C-I-D Department, Classification Department, Deputy Chief Roger Dovalina and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Zavala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyoumijran v. ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
Antranik Kyoumijran
Defendant:
ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patent Group, LLC v. Aramark Corporation
as 2:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Patent Group LLC
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
VU et al v. W&D Apparel (Jordan) Corp et al
as 4:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
THUY THI VU, Phuong-Anh Vu, BOAT PEOPLE SOS and others
Defendant:
JAMES SHEN, LUONG NHU DUONG, VU THU HA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Haywood v. Bexar County, Texas et al
as 5:2011cv01115
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Bexar County, Texas, George Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
