Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,845
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Balboa Capital v. Okoji Home
as 23-10333
Plaintiff / Appellant: Balboa Capital Corporation, a California Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: Okoji Home Visits MHT, L.L.C., a Maryland limited liability company, ULNACS Medical Care PC, a Maryland Corporation, Godswill Okoji, an individual and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. Exxon Mobil
as 23-30188
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee: Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, as successor in interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, ConocoPhillips Company, as successor in interest to General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Oil Company, Phillips Petrleum company, U.S. Oil of Louisiana, Incorporated, Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil corporation and The California Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01162
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaquemines Prsh v. Chevron USA
as 23-30153
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, Ex Rel Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor Plaintiff: Louisiana State
Defendant / Appellant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, Successor in Interest to The California Company and the Chevron Oil Company, ConocoPhillips Company, Named as Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated and Shell Oil Company
King v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00975
Plaintiff: Yolanda Denise King
Defendant: State of California, State of Georgia, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cline v. BP Products North America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00856
Plaintiff: Angel Cline
Defendant: BP America Production Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, BP Products North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen v. California Department of Parks and Recreation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00255
Plaintiff: Avery Kavon Allen
Defendant: California Department of Parks and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liberty Staffing, LLC et al v. Aim Hire, LLC
as 2:2023cv00747
Plaintiff: Liberty Staffing, LLC, Liberty Staffing Nevada, LLC and California Staffing Services, LLC
Defendant: AIM HIRE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Finite Utility Consulting, LLC. v. Tawa Inc. (Retail) a/k/a Tawa, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00432
Plaintiff: Finite Utility Consulting, Inc.
Defendant: Tawa Inc. (Retail) a/k/a Tawa, Inc., Tawa Group Holdings Inc. a/k/a Tawa Group, Tawa Supermarket, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Tawa Retail Group, Inc. a/k/a Welcome California Market, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Finite Utility Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?