Cases 71 - 80 of 164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Watson v. City of Allen, et al
as 15-90068
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JAMES H. WATSON, And Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS, CITY OF AUSTIN TEXAS, CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS and others
James Watson v. City of Allen, Texas, et al
as 15-10732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. WATSON, And Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS, CITY OF AMARILLO TEXAS, CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS and others
Dixon v. Zeem et al
as 3:2015cv02448
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Dixon
Defendant:
Muhammad E Zeem, Lew Sterrett County Jail and The City of Dallas, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stumpf et al v. The City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2015cv01944
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stumpf and Carol Stumpf
Defendant:
The City of Dallas Texas , Paul Pepe MD , Johnny Lynn Rudder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2015cv01626
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Coleman
Defendant:
City of Dallas Texas, City of Dallas Police Department, City of Dallas Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watson v. City of Allen et al
as 4:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
James H Watson
Defendant:
City of Allen, Texas , City of Amarillo, Texas, City of Arlington, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Curry v. Patino et al
as 3:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
James Lee Curry
Defendant:
Michael A Patino, Brian Fillingim and City of Dallas Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
