Cases 71 - 80 of 400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keith Smeaton v. Alan Nelson, et al
as 20-30560
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Keith Smeaton v. Alan Nelson, et al
as 20-30559
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salvador v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 5:2020cv00974
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Amina Salvador
Kanat Umarbaev, et al v. Marc Moore, et al
as 20-10781
Petitioner / Appellant:
Patricia Esteban Ramon, Juan Francisco Portillo Hernandez, Jane Doe and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Marc J. Moore, Dallas Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jimmy Johnson, Warden, Prairieland Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
