Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Brent v. Cain et al
as 4:2021cv00177
Petitioner:
James Lee Brent
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 3:2021cv00674
Defendant:
Evernorth Health, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Saddler v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00160
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Saddler
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ambrose v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
Abdur Rahim Ambrose
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Terryl Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McFarland v. Fitch et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Marcus McFarland
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Nathan Cain and Derek Mingo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Petitioner:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dickerson v. Cain et al
as 3:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
David Dickerson
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Terryl Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reardon v. City of Oxford, MS et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Deputy Courtney Dixon, Lynn Fitch, Lafayette Co Prosecutor Bela J Chain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jason Keller
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Terryl Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
