Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Michael Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10596
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Michael Davis
as 10-10095
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS
Davis et al v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08273
Plaintiff:
Shanitha Nicole Davis, Shanitha Nicole Davis, Shanitha Nicole Davis and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00761
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00741
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00555
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cunningham et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00607
Plaintiff:
Sharonda Cunningham, All Plaintiffs, Houston L. Cunningham and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Alliance Homes, Inc., American Camper Manufacturing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
