Cases 81 - 90 of 10,398
Hill et al v. AEP Texas Inc.
as 6:2024cv00022
Not Yet Classified:
American Electric Power Company, Inc
Plaintiff:
Stephen W Hill, Rachael S Hill, Charles S Childers and others
Defendant:
AEP Texas Inc.
Intervenor:
Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Citino et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Nella Citino and Daniel Mizell
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Paola Williams
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hernandez v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Elaine Hernandez
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Huyler v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Brandon Huyler
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Law v. AT&T Management Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Barry Brent Law
Defendant:
AT&T MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC A DIVISION OF AT&T CORPORATION and AT&T Management Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hearon et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Dan Hearon, Geri Sherwood and Kylin Smith
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mathews v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Scott Mathews
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Foley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Gerald Foley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Morgan et al
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
John P Morgan
Defendant:
Jeffrey T Oglesbee and Feliciana Lopez Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
