Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Tupac v. Asbury Automotive Group Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael David Tupac and Michael David Tupac
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group Inc, Asbury Arlington MB, LLC, Malcolm Russell Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Westfall et al
as 5:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Sandra K. Westfall, Rhonda Janiece Long, Ronald Eugene Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake and Eric *DO NOT FILE* Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC., Best Buy Co., Inc., Corie Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Asbury v. Avery et al
as 4:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
Joel Asbury
Defendant:
Anthony Avery and Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christophe v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al
as 3:2020cv00827
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Asbury MS Chev LLC, John Doe Company(ies) 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Christophe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
