Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00170
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc. and Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fall Line Patents, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Munoz v. Advance Stores Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01680
Plaintiff:
Orlando Munoz
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc. and Clarios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gallegos v. Advance Stores Company, Inc.
as 7:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Diana Gallegos
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00691
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
VideoSqope, LLC v. Advance Stores Company, Inc. dba Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
VideoSqope, LLC
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc. dba Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
Tommy Simmons
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. , Advance Stores Company, Inc. , Eric Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Advance Stores Company, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Terry Morgan
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
