Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ellis v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv00872
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith, Michael J. Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Collier et al
as 7:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith, Michael J. Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novodvorschi v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv00038
Defendant:
James E. Bavousett, Gregory S. Hicks, John Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Novodvorschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richerson et al
as 7:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Kendall T Richerson, Loraleah Scanlon, Elbert G Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Kamond K Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yee et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06243
Plaintiff:
Edwin E. Yee , Paula Y. Yee , Clayborn J. Adkins and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP PLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Nedro Parker, et al v. TDCJ, et al
as 14-10190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDRO GWEN PARKER and FREDERICK DEONE GOODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCIENCE CENTER/CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE CONTRACT (COMMITTEE), RICHARD E. WATHEN, In his official capacity and under color of office and others
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00621
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory B Adkins
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
