Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Marcos v. H.B. Fuller Construction Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
Julio Cordova Marcos
Defendant:
H.B. Fuller Construction Products, Inc. d/b/a H.B. Fuller Construction, H.B. Fuller Company d/b/a H.B Fuller, Jesse Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sullivan v. Fountain et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Albert Fountain, Chris Baker, Ian Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2015cv02543
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kirby and Adrian Kirby
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc , Smith & Nephew Inc, Orthopaedic Division , Smith & Nephew Inc, Orthopaedic Reconstruction and Traumatic Divisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. District Atty Office, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-10144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KYLE RICHARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, for the 266th Judicial District Court, JOHN TERRILL, District Attorney of Erath County, 266th Judicial District Court, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMY BRYANT, Sheriff of Erath County, in his individual and official capacity and others
Richards v. District Attorney's Office et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Jason Kyle Richards
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, John Terrill, Tommy Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.