Cases 1 - 10 of 12
May v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv04050
Respondent:
Bobby D Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Ronald Charles May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
May v. Collier
as 4:2020cv02118
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles May
Defendant:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11608
Plaintiff:
Charles May
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. Wicker Building Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Charles May, Jr.
Defendant:
Wicker Building Supply, Inc. and Steven Melton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ronald May v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-20272
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD CHARLES MAY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
May v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv02929
Petitioner:
Ronald Charles May
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald May v. Texas Board of Pardons & Par
as 09-20515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHARLES MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, in his/her individual and/or official capacity
Bates et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Brentton Bates, Kishma Odom, Roosevelt Owen and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Flour Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
May v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv02050
Petitioner:
Ronald Charles May
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Texas Board Of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2009cv00744
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles May
Defendant:
Texas Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
