Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Johnson
as 21-10180
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Ray Johnson, also known as Charlie
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Rafel Antion Jackson
Defendant:
Charles Ray Johnson, Dorthy Lee, Chris Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: Johnson Jr.
as 2:2016mc00168
Respondent:
Charles Ray Johnson Jr.
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
v. Johnson Jr.
as 2:2016mc00167
Respondent:
Charles Ray Johnson Jr.
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Almore et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Allen Almore , Solomon Sylvester Barger , Douglas E. Beasley, Sr. and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Johnson v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 15-20133
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
Johnson v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2014cv01055
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Johnson
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Owens et al
as 4:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Stuart Jenkins and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv01743
Plaintiff:
Johnathon David Laws
Defendant:
Charles Ray Johnson, Ron Griffin, Emfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thaler
as 6:2011cv00189
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Johnson
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
