Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Vasquez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID et al
as 4:2022cv03967
Plaintiff:
Victoriano Daniel Vasquez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Vasquez-De Leon
as 21-11015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Vasquez-De Leon
Vasquez v. Keener Construction, LLC
as 4:2020cv01703
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vasquez
Defendant:
Keener Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vasquez v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02899
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vasquez
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Vasquez v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01794
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vasquez
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
David Alfaro-Vasquez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60147
Petitioner:
DAVID ALFARO-VASQUEZ, also known as Daniel Vasquez, also known as David Ernesto Vasquez, also known as David Alfaro, also known as David Vasquez
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Daniel Vasquez
as 16-40147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL VASQUEZ
Daniel Dominquez v. Anthony Martinez, et al
as 14-11003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VASQUEZ DOMINQUEZ, also known as Daniel Vasquez Dominguez, also known as Daniel V. Dominguez
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY MARTINEZ, Food Service Manager, MARY BITELA, Correctional Officer, EDWARD CRANDALL, Correctional Officer and others
Dominquez v. Martinez et al
as 2:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vasquez Dominquez
Defendant:
Anthony Martinez, Mary Bitela, Edward Crandall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
