Cases 1 - 10 of 23
USA v. Gomez-Guijarro
as 24-50315
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Gomez-Guijarro, also known as David Gomez
Gomez v. Lamons Gasket Company et al
as 2:2023cv02850
Cross Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Eagle, Inc., Avondale Industries, Inc and others
Defendant:
Lamons Gasket Company, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Gomez
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company, Paramount Global and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gomez v. Willacy County
as 23-40439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel David Gomez
Defendant / Appellee:
Willacy County Detention Center, Joe Salazar, Sheriff, Dominico Cortez, Chief and others
Gomez v. Willacy County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Daniel David Gomez
Defendant:
Willacy County Jail, Joe Salazar, Dominico Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez et al v. Mefra Fletes SA DE CV et al
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Gomez and Ronald Vasquez
Defendant:
Mefra Fletes SA DE CV and Alberto Guadalupe Alvarez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez v. The State of Texas
as 1:2021cv00120
Petitioner:
Daniel David Gomez
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Gomez et al
as 4:2020cv02818
Defendant:
Davion Keener, David Gomez, Wilfrido Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. Salazar et al
as 5:2019cv01504
Plaintiff:
David Gomez
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar and Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Willacy County Jail
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Willacy County Jail
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
